THE END DAYS


How do we know that Maitreya is the Anti-Christ?


I. Jesus Christ is the Only-Begotten Son of God and Our Lord and God

First, we are going to show, on the authority of God -- the true Author of  the Sacred Scripture -- and on the authority of His divine institution -- His Mystical Body, the infallible Holy Roman Catholic Church, which approved the Sacred Scripture -- that Jesus Christ is the Only-Begotten Son of God, and that He is Our Lord and God.

After the resurrection, Jesus visited the Apostles. II Maitreya denies Jesus Christ born 2,000 years ago to be the ONLY-BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD and claims himself to be just that.

Based on his teaching materials at his web site "www.maitreya.org" , he previously quoted Matthew 24: 4-5 with the name Jesus being changed to Esa.

This is Maitreya's quotation: "And in answer Esa said to them, 'Take care that no one leads you astray. For many will come in my name, saying, 'I am the Christ,' and they will lead many astray."

The true quotation of Matthew 24: 4-5 is: "And Jesus answering, said to them: Take heed that no man seduce you. For many will come in my name saying, I am Christ. And they will seduce many."

His so-called disciple, in the latest revision of his web site, quotes Mark (13: 37) as "Thus Esa warned all future humanity through His followers: And what I say unto you, I say unto all, Watch!" Everything inside the double quotations is meant to be the quotation of verse 37 chapter 13 in the Gospel of St. Mark.

But the true quotation of Mark (13: 37) is "And what I say to you, I say to all: Watch." The sentence "Thus Esa warned all future humanity through His followers:" is added to the Gospel of St. Mark. Esa here, just as in the false quotation of the Gospel of St. Matthew, is used instead of Jesus.

One may ask, "what is the name Esa by which Maitreya calls Jesus?" In other words, who is Esa?

In order to answer this riddle, we need to review some basic philosophy and its Latin language. Let's quote Jacques Maritain, a well-known Catholic philosopher, a professor at the Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies in Toronto, appointed to chairs at Universities of Chicago, Columbia, and Princeton from 1948 to 1961. In his book An Introduction to Philosophy (first published 1930, reprinted by Christian Classics, Westminster MD 21157, 1991), we find:

It is clear from philosophy that a creature like Peter exists in se and per se but not a se. Only God exists a se.

Recall that many years ago in some recording cassette tapes sold by satan-worshipping musicians/singers there are some lyrics that if you play them back in reverse you will hear the words like "kill yourself", "commit suicide", "worship satan". The same principle applies here. The reverse of  a se is es a, or esa. The reverse of the Uncreated (God, a se) is the created, the esaThus, it is quite clear that Maitreya craftily hides his blasphemy and denial of Jesus to be God under the name Esa.

By downgrading Jesus to be a mere man, Maitreya denies that Jesus is God and therefore the Only-Begotten Son of God, the Christ, the Messiah. Instead, on his web site, he claims himself to be the Only-Begotten Son of God, the Christ, the Messiah. In other words, he implicitly accuses Our Lord Jesus Christ to be a fraud, an impostor, the same name that King Herod Agrippa and other founders of the Masonry used to call Jesus.

III. Denial of Jesus Christ as the Only-Begotten Son of God and the Christ incurs anathema from the Catholic Church.

Council of Nicea I in 325 declared against the Arians who did not believe in the divine nature of Jesus Christ: 

                                                        The Nicene Creed

Pope St. Leo IX on his epistle "Congratulamur vehementer" to Peter, Bishop of Antioch, April 13, 1053 declared the symbol of faith: IV. Is Maitreya an Anti-Christ?

Let's quote the Sacred Scripture to see whether Maitreya can be called an Anti-Christ.

The above quotations from the Sacred Scripture show beyond doubt that Maitreya is an Anti-Christ. But this Anti-Christ is not just any other Anti-Christ who simply claims to be God. This Anti-Christ will have the support of almost all mankind as he will unify all religions of the world. This unification can only be done on a worldwide scale when communication technology is sufficiently advanced as in the present. Moreover, behind him is the financial, political, and military power of the world. This Anti-Christ is like no other Anti-Christ. Thus, he can be truly called the Anti-Christ.

The coming of the Anti-Christ has already been prophesied in the Gospel by Our Lord Jesus Christ 2,000 years ago:

Worship of God is required of all creature including Maitreya. By refusing to recognize Jesus as the Messiah and the Christ, Maitreya refuses to kneel down before Jesus to worship Him as God. Let's quote the Sacred Scripture. Why does Maitreya refuse to worship Jesus as God? Because he claims himself to be God and will demand worship from man. V Maitreya's teaching that all religions, as represented by the seven great religions contained in his great sign, form eternal divine path capable of leading to God directly contradicts Our Lord Jesus Christ's teaching. Our Lord Jesus Christ, true God and true Man, has taught that there is only one way leading to God, one truth leading to The Eternal Truth and Eternal Life. And yet, Maitreya claims that all religions lead to God, the Divine Truth. Moreover, there is no other name who can save mankind except Jesus Christ. Yet Maitreya claims he can save mankind. Since there is only one truth, the truth taught be Our Lord Jesus Christ who was born about 2,000 years ago, the other teaching by Maitreya must be false. And no one can lead man to God except through Jesus Christ. Thus Maitreya's claim that the path represented by all major religions lead to God must be false. Since there is only one name that can save man and that name is Jesus Christ, Maitreya's claim of saving man must be false. Thus, if anyone including Maitreya who teaches a gospel that is different from the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, he would bring on himself  an anathema.

But it is not enough to believe in Jesus Christ to be saved. To be saved, one has belong to the Holy Roman Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation. Various Popes in the past has defined ex-cathedra the dogma "Outside the Roman Catholic Church there is no salvation" (extra Ecclesiam nullam esse salutem) and has condemned the error of indifferentism which says that all religions can save.

Pope Boniface VIII in the Bull "Unam Sanctam", November 18, 1302, declared ex-cathedra:

 Pope Eugene IV declared ex-cathedra in the Bull "Cantata Domino" on February 4, 1442: Pope Pius IV in the Bull "Iniunctum Nobis", November 13, 1565, declared ex-cathedra: Pope Gregory XVI, in his Encyclical "Mirari Vos" On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, August, 15, 1832, pronounced against the error of indifferentism which Maitreya proclaims: In similar terms, Pope Pius IX declared against the error of indifferentism in his Encyclical "Quanto Conficiamur moerore", August 10, 1863 : The following three errors (among others) are also condemned by Pope Pius IX, i.e. those who believe them are anathematized: Remember that an ex-cathedra definition or declaration by a legitimate Pope has the force of an dogmatic truth the refusal of which means excommunication and being cut off from the Mystical Body of Christ, and therefore, being cursed (anathematized). In addition, the definition or declaration (which usually starts with "We firmly believe, profess, and proclaim that ...." for a positive definition, and "let him be anathema" for a negative definition) is irreversible, meaning that no statement from any other Pope afterward can contradict the previously declared dogma.

Pope Pius IX defined the infallibility of the Pope as he chaired the First Vatican Council (session 4) on July 18, 1870:

Most recently, in his Speech to the Third General Assembly of Latin American Bishops, January 28, 1979; and in the Radio Message on Eighth Centenary of St. Francis of Assisi, October 3, 1981, Pope John Paul II reaffirmed the Sacred Tradition: To clarify the dogma that "there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church", Pope Innocent III repeated, in a letter to Humbert, Archbishop of Arles, in 1201, what has been the Sacred Tradition of the Church: VI. As Maitreya changes the words of the Gospel, he is called a liar by the Sacred Scripture.

By changing the Name of Jesus (God and man, Son of God) in the Gospel of St. Matthew and St. Mark into Esa (only a creature), he changes the Sacred Scripture to point to him as the Messiah or the Christ.

V. It has been established beyond doubt above by Maitreya's own teaching that he is a liar, a deceiver, and the Anti-Christ. Then he is also a son of Satan, the Devil, in exactly the same way that Our Lord Jesus Christ said of the Jews who refused to believe in Him as the Christ and the Messiah: VII. Conclusion: Why should one believe in a liar, a deceiver, a blasphemer, a murderer of souls, an anathema, and a son of Satan, the Devil? And the Anti-Christ Maitreya is all of these.

In any case, remember the Anti-Christ Maitreya, in the end, will be defeated by Jesus Christ and His army of Angels and Saints, and be cast alive into Hell.


Marian Cross

The End Days

"Who is like unto God?"

Created July 16, 1996. First version of this article: Feast of the Holy Mother of God, January 1, 1998. First revision: January 17, 1998.